scNetViz: from single cells to networks using Cytoscape
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) has revolutionized molecular biology and medicine by enabling high-throughput studies of cellular heterogeneity in diverse tissues. Applying network biology approaches to scRNA-seq data can provide useful insights into genes driving heterogeneous cell-type compositions of tissues. Here, we present scNetViz — a Cytoscape app to aid biological interpretation of cell clusters in scRNA-seq data using network analysis. scNetViz calculates the differential expression of each gene across clusters and then creates a cluster-specific gene functional interaction network between the significantly differentially expressed genes for further analysis, such as pathway enrichment analysis. To automate a complete data analysis workflow, scNetViz integrates parts of the Scanpy software, which is a popular Python package for scRNA-seq data analysis, with Cytoscape apps such as stringApp , cyPlot , and enhancedGraphics . We describe our implementation of methods for accessing data from public single cell atlas projects, differential expression analysis, visualization, and automation. scNetViz enables users to analyze data from public atlases or their own experiments, which we illustrate with two use cases. Analysis can be performed via the Cytoscape GUI or CyREST programming interface using R (RCy3) or Python (py4cytoscape).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.113 | 0.038 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".