Effect of a Circular Slot on Hybrid Airship Aerodynamic Characteristics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This numerical study reports the aerodynamic properties of a hybrid airship. The hybrid airships were designed by combining two semi-ellipsoids with a semi-discoid as the base model. From the base model, three different geometrics were identified to study their aerodynamic characteristics. A circular slot was provided between the pressure side and the suction side of the airship. The objective of this study was to realize the flow behavior, aerodynamic characteristics, and stability properties of such slotted hybrid flying vehicles. Interestingly, the results imply that the lift coefficient increases with an increase in the angle of attack for the slotted configurations; this is because the flow separation is delayed due to the slot opening, which in turn is due to the flow of energies from the high-pressure region to the bottom through the slots. The delayed stall angle was 50 degrees, which was 10% more than that of the base model. Aerodynamic characteristics are discussed based on surface pressure, coefficient of lift, and coefficient of drag for various slotted hybrid airships.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".