MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3172326797 · doi:10.1109/fccm51124.2021.00050

FFIVE: An FPGA Framework for Interactive VNF Environments

2021· article· en· W3172326797 on OpenAlexaff
Juan Camilo Vega, Mohammad Ewais, Alberto Leon Garcia, Paul Chow

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSoftware deploymentField-programmable gate arraySoftwareVirtual networkLatency (audio)ImplementationEmbedded systemVirtualizationOperating systemBandwidth (computing)Computer networkCloud computingTelecommunicationsSoftware engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. In the world of telecommunications, there is greater focus on using Virtual Network Functions (VNFs) managed by Software Defined Networking (SDN). VNFs are tradition-ally implemented as software functions, but as technology evolves and application demands dramatically increase, the high performance and low latency of FPGAs make them more suited for use in VNF implementations. We propose FFIVE, a framework for the creation of FPGA-based VNF containers that can be deployed and man-aged in the same way as software-based VNF containers, but with improved bandwidth, efficiency, and latency. Our framework offers an approach for the virtualization of FPGA devices, the deployment of FPGA-based Virtual Network Functions (VNFs), and configuring the VNFs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207