MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Valores Pessoais e Profissionais de Enfermeiros: uma revisão integrativa

2021· article· pt· W3172351596 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnfermagem em Foco · 2021
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEthics in medical practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyMedicinePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objetivo: Analisar publicações sobre valores pessoais e profissionais de enfermeiros e sua relação com a formação e a prática clínica de enfermagem. Metodologia: Revisão integrativa de artigos indexados nas bases MEDLINE, LILACS e CINAHL publicados entre 2014 a 2019, que abordaram os valores pessoais e profissionais na enfermagem, sendo analisados por estatística descritiva das frequências e analise de conteúdo temático de Bardin. Resultados: Foram selecionados treze artigos, em português, espanhol e inglês, em oito revistas distintas. Os países que tiveram instituições filiadas aos estudos foram Turquia, Canadá, Espanha, Colômbia, Estados Unidos, Brasil e Irã. Os locais de desenvolvimento dos estudos foram em instituições de ensino superior, hospitais e unidades básicas de saúde. A metodologia mais utilizada foi a quantitativa. As categorias temáticas constituídas foram: instrumentos para avaliação de valores da enfermagem, descrição sobre os valores na enfermagem e fatores associados, diferenças intergeracionais e evolução dos valores. Conclusão: Concluiu-se que a busca pelo conhecimento sobre os valores da enfermagem é universal, porém pouco abordada no contexto brasileiro. A dignidade humana foi o valor mais representado nos estudos. A formação de valores contribui para a formação e aprimoramento de profissionais qualificados que contribui a segurança na prática clínica.Descritores: Capacitação profissional; Cuidados de enfermagem; Ética em Enfermagem; Valores Sociais. The personal and professional values of nurses: an integrated revision Objective: To analyze publications on nurses' personal and professional values and their relationship with nursing education and clinical practice. Methodology: Integrative review of articles indexed in the MEDLINE, LILACS and CINAHL databases published between 2014 and 2019, which addressed personal and professional values in nursing, being analyzed by descriptive statistics of the frequencies and analysis of thematic content of Bardin. Results: Thirteen articles were selected, in Portugueses, Spanish and English, in eight different journals. The countries that had institutions affiliated to the studies were Turkey, Canada, Spain, Colombia, United States, Brazil and Iran. The places where the studies were developed were in higher education institutions, hospitals and basic health units. The most used methodology was quantitative. The constituted thematic categories were: instruments for evaluating nursing values, description of nursing values and associated factors, intergenerational differences and evolution of values. Conclusion: It was concluded that the search for knowledge about nursing values is universal, but little addressed in the Brazilian context. Human dignity was the most represented value in studies. The formation of values contributes to the training and improvement of qualified professionals that contributes to safety in clinical practice.Descriptors: Ethics Nursing; Nursing Care; Professional Training; Social Values. Valores personales y profesionales de enfermeras: una revisión integrativa Objetivo: Analizar publicaciones sobre los valores personales y profesionales del enfermero y su relación con la formación y práctica clínica en enfermería. Metodología: Revisión integradora de artículos indexados en las bases de datos MEDLINE, LILACS y CINAHL publicados entre 2014 y 2019, que abordaron valores personales y profesionales en enfermería, siendo analizados mediante estadística descriptiva de las frecuencias y análisis de contenido temático de Bardin. Resultados: Se seleccionaron trece artículos, en portugués, español e inglés, en ocho revistas diferentes. Los países que tenían instituciones afiliadas a los estudios fueron Turquía, Canadá, España, Colombia, Estados Unidos, Brasil e Irán, los lugares donde se desarrollaron los estudios fueron en instituciones de educación superior, hospitales y unidades básicas de salud. La metodología más utilizada fue la cuantitativa. Las categorías temáticas constituidas fueron: instrumentos de evaluación de los valores de enfermería, descripción de los valores de enfermería y factores asociados, diferencias intergeneracionales y evolución de valores. Conclusión: Se concluyó que la búsqueda del conocimiento sobre los valores de la enfermería es universal, pero poco abordada en el contexto brasileño. La dignidad humana fue el valor más representado en los estudios. La formación de valores contribuye a la formación y mejora de profesionales cualificados que contribuyan a la seguridad en la práctica clínica.Descriptores: Atención de Enfermería; Capacitación Profesional; Ética en Enfermería; Valores Sociales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.090
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.090
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.501
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it