MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3172364546

The States and Traits of EEG Variability

2021· dissertation· en· W3172364546 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erin Alexandra Gibson

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyPsychologyCognitive psychologyNeuroscience
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The States and Traits of EEG VariabilityErin Gibson Doctor of Philosophy Institute of Medical Science University of Toronto 2021 Neurons in the brain are seldom perfectly quiet. They continually receive input and generate output, resulting in noisy, highly variable patterns of ongoing activity. Yet the functional significance and behavioral consequences of this variability remains largely unknown. We hypothesize that brain signal variability is tightly coupled to the processing of task-relevant information and serves as an important indicator of cognitive function. To test this, we examine EEG activity in young, healthy adults as they perform a cognitive skill learning and resting state task. Several measures of EEG variability and signal strength are calculated at multiple timescales, or in overlapping time windows that span the trial interval. We perform a systematic examination of the factors that most strongly influence the variability and strength of EEG activity. Study 1 examines the relative sensitivity of each measure to trait-level variation across subjects and state-level variation across task blocks. We find that EEG variability is most sensitive to trait-level differences across individuals that remain relatively stable across blocks. Study 2 examines the sensitivity of each measure to different sources of state-level variation across task blocks. We find that key task-driven changes in EEG activity are better reflected in the strength, rather than the variability, of EEG activity. Study 3 examines trait-level variation in each measure and its relationship with behavior. We find that differences in learning speed and acquired skill across individuals are better reflected in relative changes in the variability, rather than the strength, of EEG activity. These results demonstrate that EEG variability is particularly sensitive to stable trait-level variation across individuals and relative changes in EEG variability around a particular level, rather than the level itself, are a strong indicator of behavioral performance in young, healthy adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207