Ship‐iceberg discrimination from Sentinel‐1 synthetic aperture radar data using parallel convolutional neural network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Ships and icebergs are similar in size and intensity in SAR images, so it is difficult to distinguish them in remote sensing images. Deep learning is a technique based on neural networks, which has played an important role in image information processing. In order to address the challenge of ship and iceberg classification, we present a convolutional neural network (CNN) based classification method for iceberg and ship discrimination from Sentinel‐1 SAR images with different polarizations and incidence angles. The method is based on the fixed constant false alarm rate (CFAR) detector and the CNN model has three input channels, then the model was trained using parallel algorithm. The CNN is trained using 1443 images and tested using 161 images. The CNN model is also compared with support vector machine (SVM) and k nearest neighbors (kNN) using the same dataset. Comparison shows the CNN‐based method performs the best, and it achieved a validation accuracy of 96%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".