MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Bcl‐2 family members Mcl‐1 and Bim modulate apoptosis in glutamine‐deprived Sp2/0‐Ag14 mouse cells

2013· article· en· W3172416502 on OpenAlexaffabout
Eric R. Gauthier, Catherine Zhou, Jenna Woodley, Curtis C. Harnett

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell death mechanisms and regulation
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPumaGlutamineApoptosisProgrammed cell deathWestern blotCell cultureReprogrammingBiologyDownregulation and upregulationCell biologyFlow cytometryCellMolecular biologyChemistryBiochemistryAmino acidGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In highly proliferating cells, metabolic reprogramming results in a cellular dependence toward L‐glutamine (Gln), a phenomenon of marked therapeutic interest. However, the molecular events linking Gln to cell survival are still poorly defined. Our group has shown that Sp2/0‐Ag14 (Sp2/0) cells are acutely sensitive to Gln starvation, undergoing apoptosis via the intrinsic pathway after only 2 hours of Gln deprivation. The current study examined the relative contribution of proteins of the Bcl‐2 family in this phenomenon. Immunoblotting revealed that Mcl‐1, Bax, Bim and Puma are the major Bcl‐2 family proteins expressed in Sp2/0 cells. While Sp2/0 cells with an RNAi‐induced decrease in Puma levels behaved like the wild‐type cell line, reducing Bim expression led to a significant increase in cell survival following Gln deprivation. Western blot analysis revealed that Gln starvation did not affect Bim levels, but did lead to a reduction in Mcl‐1. We found that Sp2/0 cells are highly sensitive to obatoclax, a Mcl‐1‐specific chemical inhibitor. Furthermore, obatoclax increased the sensitivity of Sp2/0 cells to glutamine starvation, an effect prevented by the constitutive expression of Bcl‐xL (which is not targeted by the drug). All together, our data place Mcl‐1 and Bim at the core of the apoptotic machinery triggered by Gln starvation in Sp2/0 cells. Funded by NSERC‐CANADA (to ERG).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicCell death mechanisms and regulation→French-language works237,207→