MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3172451078 · doi:10.21428/594757db.1ee3922d

Latent Vector Recovery of Audio GANs with Application in Deepfake Audio Detection

2021· article· en· W3172451078 on OpenAlexaff
Nicky Bayat, Vahid Reza Khazaie, Andrew Keyes, Yalda Mohsenzadeh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceResidualFeature vectorSpeech recognitionArtificial neural networkEncoderPattern recognition (psychology)Algorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advanced Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are remarkable in generating in- telligible audio from a random latent vector. In this paper, we examine the task of recovering the latent vector of both synthesized and real audio. We propose an auto- encoder inspired technique to train a deep residual neural network architecture to project audio synthesized by WaveGAN into the corresponding latent space with near identical reconstruction performance. To accommodate for the lack of an original latent vector for real audio, we optimize the residual network on a multi-level feature loss between the real audio samples and the reconstructed audio of the predicted latent vectors. In the case of synthesized audio, the Mean Squared Error (MSE) between the ground truth and recovered latent vector is minimized as well. We further investigated the audio reconstruction performance when several gradient optimization steps are applied to the predicted latent vector. Through our auto-encoder inspired method of training on real and synthesized audio, we are able to predict a latent vector that corresponds to a reasonable reconstruction of real audio. After training, we investigated the latent representations of real and synthesized audio files. Our analysis revealed distinct latent representational patterns for real and synthesized audio which can be used for deepfake audio detection. Even though we evaluated our method on WaveGAN, our proposed method is universal and can be applied to any other GANs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.679
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207