MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3172685034 · doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ac072b

Probing M87 Globular Clusters for Flaring Ultraluminous X-Ray Sources

2021· article· en· W3172685034 on OpenAlexaff
Jeff Huang, Yifan Sun, Kristen C. Dage, Daryl Haggard

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Notes of the AAS · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobular clusterPhysicsAstrophysicsX-rayGalaxyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present X-ray analysis of three short Chandra observations of M87. The basis of this analysis is the search for possible new ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs) in M87's globular clusters (GCs) and attempt to quantify possible variability within the observations. We searched Chandra ObsIDs 1808 (2000 July 30, 14 ks) Wilson & Yang, 3975 (2002 November 17, 5 ks) and 3977 (2003 February 4, 5 ks) Harris et al. and identified one previously discovered GC ULX, and two new GC ULX candidates. Analysis of the light-curves revealed no new evidence of variability in these sources for the duration of the observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Notes of the AASSame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207