MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3172749061

PROJETO DE UM SENSOR DE TORQUE SEM FIO PARA EIXOS GIRANTES

2019· article· pt· W3172749061 on OpenAlexaff
Ícaro de Vasconcelos Brito, Michael Hou, Eduardo Oliveira Freire

Bibliographic record

VenueCongresso Brasileiro de Automática - CBA · 2019
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEngineering
TopicTransport Systems and Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesArduinoStrain gaugeTorqueElectrical engineeringOperating systemComputer scienceArtEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo descreve a implementacao de um sensor de torque sem fio de baixo custo para aplicacoes em eixos giran-tes. O instrumento e capaz de medir o torque em maquinas rotativas, enviando, sem fio, o sinal relacionado a grandeza para um dispositivo Android, que funciona como sistema de aquisicao de dados. O conceito do projeto e baseado em medicoes de tensao utilizando extensometros resistivos (strain gauges). O projeto inclui um conjunto de straing gauges 350 Ω em ponte completa, um kit Arduino UNO, um adaptador SD para Arduino, um modulo Bluetooth e um conversor analogico-digital (ADC) de 24 bits. A implementacao consiste em instalar os strain gauges, programar o Arduino e fabricar o circuito ADC. Apos essas etapas, o sensor e testado em um braco de alavanca. Os resultados mostram que o sistema pode realizar medicoes de torque com uma resolucao de 0,0138 N·m, exibindo, em tempo real, a curva de torque em uma tela de smartphone/tablet. Assim, o sensor de torque apresentado representa um instrumento versatil, preciso e de baixo custo para auxiliar na avaliacao de desempenho e em projetos de maquinas girantes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCongresso Brasileiro de Automática - CBASame topicTransport Systems and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207