On-line characterization of wood chip brightness and chemical composition by means of visible and near-infrared spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Historically, on-line and real-time measurement of wood chip properties in the pulp and paper industry has been a challenge and has hampered the development of advanced process control strategies. In this study, visible and near-infrared (VIS-NIR) spectroscopy is investigated as a means to characterize wood chip brightness and chemical composition (i.e. extractives, lignin and holocellulose content) on-line. The estimated standard error on the holocellulose reference measurement was significantly reduced using data reconciliation. VIS-NIR calibration models were developed using partial least square regression. Derivative and baseline correction were found to be the most appropriate pre-processing methods. Model desensitization to the influence of moisture content and temperature by means of external parameter orthogonalization resulted in more robust models critical for on-line applications under harsh industrial conditions. Wavelength selection improved model accuracy for all properties. A comparison of two different spectrometer and probe combinations demonstrated that, after wavelengths selection, a non-contact measurement of wood chips performs as well as a contact measurement of wood powder for monitoring chemical composition. On-line prediction of wood chip brightness and chemical composition using the developed VIS-NIR models was demonstrated over 7 months in a kraft pulp mill processing both hardwood and softwood chips.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".