Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This issue of SYNFORM is packed full of great science, as it features three SYNSTORY articles covering recent breakthroughs in the area of organic chemistry.The first one tells a fascinat ing story bridging organic synthesis with biotechnology that was recently published in a Nature paper by the group of Professor H. Liu (USA): the discovery of an enzymatic [4+2] cycloaddition as the key step in the synthesis of spinosyn A, a complex tetracyclic macrocyle with a selective and environmentally benign insect control activity produced by some bacterial organisms.In the second SYNSTORY, Professor J. Read de Alaniz (USA) discloses how his group was able to develop a straightforward method to produce highly reactive acylnitroso compounds and use them for an efficient acylnitroso-ene reaction producing allylic hydroxamic acids and oxime derivatives.Last but not least, in the third SYNSTORY, Professor A. K. Yudin (Canada) tells us about his recently discovered acid-promoted Pdcatalyzed skeletal rearrangement of cyclic amine substrates producing a ring contraction leading to cyclic allyl amines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.419 | 0.043 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it