MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3173034327 · doi:10.1101/2021.06.15.448622

Multiple RSV strains infecting HEp-2 and A549 cells reveal cell line-dependent differences in resistance to RSV infection

2021· preprint· en· W3173034327 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anubama Rajan, Felipe-Andrés Piedra, Letisha Aideyan, Trevor McBride, Matthew J. Robertson, Hannah L. Johnson, Gina M. Aloisio, David Henke, Cristian Coarfa, Fabio Stossi, Vipin K. Menon, HarshaVardhan Doddapaneni, Donna M. Muzny, Sara J. Javornik Cregeen, Kristi L. Hoffman, Joseph F. Petrosino, Richard A. Gibbs, Vasanthi Avadhanula, Pedro A. Piedra

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirologyBiologyVirusCell cultureA549 cellViral replicationGeneGenotypePhenotypeGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of pediatric acute respiratory infection worldwide. There are currently no approved vaccines or antivirals to combat RSV disease. A few transformed cell lines and two historic strains have been extensively used to study RSV. Here we report a thorough molecular and cell biological characterization of HEp-2 and A549 cells infected with four strains of RSV representing both major subgroups as well as historic and more contemporaneous genotypes -- [RSV/A/Tracy (GA1), RSV/A/Ontario (ON), RSV/B/18537 (GB1), RSV/B/Buenos Aires (BA)] -- via measurements of viral replication kinetics and viral gene expression, immunofluorescence-based imaging of gross cellular morphology and cell-associated RSV, and measurements of host response including transcriptional changes and levels of secreted cytokines and growth factors. Our findings strongly suggest 1) the existence of a conserved difference in gene expression between RSV subgroups A and B; 2) the A549 cell line is a more stringent and natural host of replicating RSV than the HEp-2 cell line; and 3) consistent with previous studies, determining the full effects of viral genetic variation in RSV pathogenesis requires model systems as tractable as transformed cell lines but better representative of the human host. IMPORTANCE Infection with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) early in life is essentially guaranteed and can lead to severe disease. In vitro data from two historic RSV/A strains and two cell lines, HEp-2 and A549, constitute most of our knowledge; but RSV contains ample variation from two evolving subgroups (A and B) showing recent convergent evolution. Here we measure viral action and host response in HEp-2 and A549 cells infected with four RSV strains from both subgroups and representing both historic and more contemporaneous strains. We discover a subgroup-dependent difference in viral gene expression and find A549 cells are more potently antiviral and more sensitive, albeit subtly, to viral variation. Our findings reveal important differences between RSV subgroups and two widely used cell lines and provide baseline data for experiments with model systems better representative of natural RSV infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicRespiratory viral infections research→French-language works237,207→