MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3173066453 · doi:10.1063/5.0040884

Chemical transformation of molecular ices containing N2O and C2D2 by low energy electrons: New chemical species of astronomical interest

2021· article· en· W3173066453 on OpenAlexafffund
Nasrin Mirsaleh‐Kohan, Sasan Esmaili, A. D. Bass, Michael A. Huels, Léon Sanche

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyDesorptionIonMoleculeFragmentation (computing)ChemistryElectronScatteringElectron ionizationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Chemical stateElectron spectroscopyPhotochemistryIonizationPhysical chemistryAdsorptionOrganic chemistryPhysicsNuclear magnetic resonance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have employed electron stimulated desorption (ESD) and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to study the chemical species generated from multilayer films of N2O, C2D2, and mixtures thereof (i.e., N2O/C2D2) by the impact of low energy electrons with energies between 30 and 70 eV. Our ESD results for pure films of N2O show the production of numerous fragment cations and anions, and of larger molecular ions, of sufficient kinetic energy to escape into vacuum, which are likely formed by ion–molecule scattering in the film. Ion–molecule scattering is also responsible for the production of cations from C2D2 films that contain as many as six or seven carbon atoms. Many of the same anions and cations desorb from N2O/C2D2 mixtures, as well as new species, which is the result of ion–molecule scattering in the film. Anion desorption signals further indicate the formation of C–N containing species within the irradiated films. XPS spectra of N1s, C1s, and O1s lines reveal the fragmentation of N–O bonds and gradual formation of molecules containing species containing O–C=O, C=O, and C–O functional groups. A comparison between ESD and XPS findings suggests that species observed in the ESD channel are primarily products of reactions taking place at the film–vacuum interface, while those observed in the XPS derive from reactions occurring within the solid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207