MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3173115481 · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.352718

Distribución del abies religiosa (kunth) schltdl. & cham. Bajo escenarios de cambio climático en el eje Neovolcánico, Mexico

2025· other· en· W3173115481 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ramiro Pérez Miranda

Bibliographic record

VenueAgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemperate climateGeographyForestryDistribution (mathematics)Vegetation (pathology)EcologyBiologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sacred fir (Abies religiosa) is a species of high mountain temperate climate, found in the central states of México. The species serves as shelter for the monarch butterfly, which travels from the United States and Canada, and therefore has ecological importance. The current potential distribution of the sacred fir forests was determined, as well as under scenarios of climate change (CC), in the Transversal Neovolcanic Axis. The distribution models were obtained by applying the GARP algorithm in combination with climate, topographic, vegetation, soil coverages, and points of presence of the species. According to the results, the current potential distribution area of the sacred fir is concentrated mostly in the states of Estado de México, Morelos, Michoacán, Querétaro, Ciudad de México and Puebla with 5,190,902 ha. The possible distribution under scenarios of CC RCP4.5 for the year 2039 would be 8,060,023.10 ha, essentially in Hidalgo, Estado de México, Morelos, Michoacán, Querétaro and Ciudad de México. The results suggest a potential increase in the species distribution under the current scenarios and with CC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.279

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityFrench-language works237,207