MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3173117557 · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.05.010

Bi-allelic variants in the ER quality-control mannosidase gene EDEM3 cause a congenital disorder of glycosylation

2021· article· en· W3173117557 on OpenAlexafffund
D.L. Polla, Andrew C. Edmondson, Sandrine Duvet, Michael March, Ana Berta Sousa, Anna Lehman, Dmitriy Niyazov, Fleur van Dijk, Serwet Demirdas, Marjon A. van Slegtenhorst, Anneke J.A. Kievit, Céline Schulz, Linlea Armstrong, Xin Bi, Daniel J. Rader, Kosuke Izumi, Elaine H. Zackai, Elisa De Franco, Paula Jorge, Sophie C. Huffels, Marina P. Hommersom, Sian Ellard, Dirk J. Lefeber, Avni Santani, Nicholas J. Hand, Hans van Bokhoven, Miao He, Arjan P.M. de Brouwer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Human Genetics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Human Genome Research InstituteSeventh Framework ProgrammeNational Institutes of HealthCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorGenome British ColumbiaBC Children’s Hospital FoundationFondation LeducqNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of General Medical SciencesAmerican Heart Association
KeywordsUnfolded protein responseEndoplasmic reticulumMissense mutationBiologyEndoplasmic-reticulum-associated protein degradationExome sequencingTunicamycinGeneAlleleGlycosylationMutant proteinCompound heterozygosityGeneticsMannosidaseMutantMutationCell biologyGlycoprotein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Human GeneticsSame topicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207