MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Selenide stimulates the biliary excretion of arsenic in human HepaRG cells

2021· article· en· W3173122050 on OpenAlexaff
Janet R. Zhou, Gurnit Kaur, Yingze Ma, Elaine M. Leslie

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicArsenic contamination and mitigation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArsenicSeleniumExcretionMultidrug resistance-associated protein 2SelenideCarcinogenChemistryArsenic toxicityBiologyBiochemistryPhysiologyATP-binding cassette transporter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arsenic is classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as a Group I (proven) human carcinogen causing lung, skin and bladder cancer. Conservative estimates suggest that between 92‐220 million people worldwide are exposed to arsenic at levels exceeding the World Health Organization guideline of 10 µg/L. In animal models arsenic and selenium are mutually protective via the formation and biliary excretion of the seleno‐bis (S‐glutathionyl) arsinium ion [SeAs(GS) 2 ] ‐ , which allows for the fecal elimination of both compounds. Consistent with this, selenium deficiency in humans living in arsenic endemic regions is associated with an increased risk of arsenic induced disease. These observations have led to the initiation of human selenium supplementation trials. Despite these ongoing trials in arsenic endemic regions, the influence of selenium on human hepatic handling of arsenic is not adequately understood. Furthermore, supplementation trials have utilized different chemical forms of selenium with unknown influence on efficacy. In the liver, multidrug resistance protein 2 (MRP2/ABCC2) transports arsenic metabolites, including [SeAs(GS) 2 ] ‐ into bile, and the related MRP4 (ABCC4) transports other arsenic metabolites into hepatic sinusoids. We hypothesized that selenium increases biliary excretion of arsenite (As III ) from HepaRG cells, an immortalized cell line used as a surrogate for primary human hepatocytes. Our objective was to study the influence of selenite (Se IV ), selenide (HSe ‐ ), methylselenocysteine (MeSeCys) and selenomethionine (SeMet) on arsenic efflux from HepaRG cells. HepaRG cells were untreated, or treated with 1 µM As III ± selenium (Se IV , HSe ‐ , MeSeCys or SeMet) for 48 hr. Then crude membrane preparations of HepaRG cells were subjected to immunoblots to evaluate the presence of MRP2 and MRP4 proteins. MRP2 function was evaluated by 5(6)‐carboxy,2’,7’ dichlorofluorescein (CDF) accumulation in canalicular networks by fluorescence microscopy. Transport across sinusoidal and canalicular membranes was measured after treatment of HepaRG cells with 1 µM 73 As III ± selenium (Se IV , HSe ‐ , MeSeCys or SeMet) using B‐CLEAR® technology. Biliary excretion indices (BEIs) were calculated to quantify the extent of arsenic export into bile. Transport was re‐evaluated under conditions expected to inhibit efflux. MRP2 and MRP4 proteins are present in HepaRG cells. MRP2 levels increased after treatment with As III ± HSe ‐ , whereas MRP4 levels increased after treatment with 1 µM As III . CDF accumulated in canalicular networks, suggesting the presence of functional MRP2. At a 5 minute time point, the BEI of 73 As III alone was 13±7%, which was stimulated by the presence of HSe ‐ (BEI=31±7%). Biliary excretion of 73 As III was lost in the presence of other selenium forms, but sinusoidal efflux of 73 As III was stimulated by MeSeCys. Reduction of hepatobiliary transport was observed at 4 ∘ C as well as with inhibitors of glutathione synthesis and MRPs. Arsenic underwent biliary excretion in HepaRG cells, and this was stimulated by HSe ‐ , the biologically active form of selenium metabolism. Arsenic hepatobiliary transport by MRP2 is temperature and glutathione dependent. This work advances understanding of selenium effects on arsenic handling by human liver.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicArsenic contamination and mitigationFrench-language works237,207