ANALISIS KEJADIAN STUNTING TERHADAP PERKEMBANGAN ANAK USIA 6-24 BULAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stunting is a condition of a person's height shorter than the height of other people in general (the same age). Stunting will affect physical performance and mental and intellectual functions will be disrupted. Children with stunting are left behind in several aspects of child development including: fine motor, gross motor, speech and language as well as socialization and independence.This study aims to analyze the relationship of stunting with the development of children aged 6 to 24 months in the working area of the Perumnas 2 Public Health Center in Pontianak, Kalimantan Barat. This type of research is quantitative using a cross-sectional approach. The sample in this study consisted of 45 respondents in the are worked community health center Perumnas 2 pontianak. Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that partially the variables associated with stunting are social personal, fine motor, language and gross motor. After a logistic regression test It was found that stunting variables were simultaneously related to child development with a p-value of 0.0001.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".