MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W31731559 · doi:10.1017/s0074180900182336

Stellar Activity Enhancement by Planets: Theory and Observations

2004· article· en· W31731559 on OpenAlexaff
Steven H. Saar, M. Cuntz, Evgenya L. Shkolnik

Bibliographic record

VenueSymposium - International Astronomical Union · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of Texas at ArlingtonNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsPhysicsExoplanetPlanetStarsAstronomyAstrophysicsJupiter (rocket family)Astrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many of the newly discovered exoplanets are gas giants in close proximity to their parent stars. Therefore, they raise tides on their host stars, and (if similar to Jupiter) will likely have substantial magnetospheres which can interact with stellar magnetic field. Both tidal and magnetospheric interactions can enhance stellar activity levels. An initial search for such planet-induced activity using the Ca ii IR triplet found no clear signal, but recently a more sensitive study using the Ca ii H and K lines has uncovered evidence for planet-enhanced emission on HD 179949, and hints of it in other systems. The phase dependence of the enhanced emission for HD 179949 suggests a magnetospheric interaction. We discuss a simple model of this interaction, the implications of this possible detection for diagnosing exoplanetary magnetospheres, and future observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSymposium - International Astronomical UnionSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207