MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3173163212 · doi:10.7870/cjcmh-2021-001

Transitional Employment Programs within Clubhouses as a Means of Promoting Recovery for Individuals Living with Mental Illness: Reviewing the Case for Québec

2021· article· en· W3173163212 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Kristen Reidel, Shelagh Abriel, Rachel Tavares, Mollie Roark, Ruth McLellan, Eva Kehayia

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Community Mental Health · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in RehabilitationMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental illnessNarrativeWork (physics)Supported employmentIndependent livingPsychologyMental healthNursingSociologyPublic relationsPolitical scienceMedicineGerontologyPsychotherapistEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transitional employment (TE) within the Clubhouse model has been adopted across Canada and the world for its effectiveness in promoting work and recovery for persons living with mental illness. However, attempts to establish a TE program in the province of Québec have been met with numerous roadblocks. Using a qualitative phenomenological approach, this study aimed to synthesize knowledge that could inform local implementation of TE. Experiences of Montréal Clubhouse members and Canadian Clubhouse directors were examined. Member narratives identified employment-program and systemic shortcomings, while directors provided key strategies for overcoming barriers to TE implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.830

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0240.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Community Mental HealthSame topicEmployment and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207