MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3173175377 · doi:10.1093/forestry/cpab029

Effect of scan angle on ALS metrics and area-based predictions of forest attributes for balsam fir dominated stands

2021· article· en· W3173175377 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Olivier R. van Lier, J. Luther, Joanne C. White, Richard Fournier, Jean-François Côté

Bibliographic record

VenueForestry An International Journal of Forest Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest Service
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNadirBalsamContext (archaeology)Remote sensingAbies balsameaPercentileEnvironmental sciencePoint cloudMathematicsStatisticsGeographyComputer sciencePhysicsSatellite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this study, we assessed the effect of airborne laser scanning (ALS) scan angle on point cloud metrics and the estimation of forest attributes in balsam fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.) dominated forests of western Newfoundland, Canada. We collected calibration data from ground plot locations representing varying scan angles from two flight lines: within 4° of nadir in one flight line, and either 11–20° from nadir (low scan angle plots: L), or 21–30° from nadir (high scan angle plots: H) in an adjacent flight line. We computed three sets of ALS point cloud metrics for each ground plot using ALS data from: individual flight lines (near-nadir and off-nadir) and data from all available flight lines (up to 4) combined (aggregated, as commonly used in an operational inventory context). We generated three sets of models for each of the L and H plots using the ALS metric sets, and applied the models to independent validation data. We analysed the effect of scan angle on both the ALS metrics and performance statistics for area-based models generated using the L and H datasets. Our results demonstrate that off-nadir scan angles significantly affected (P < 0.05) specific metrics from both L (i.e. coefficient of variation (COVAR)) and H (i.e. maximum height, 95th percentile of height, mean height) plots, although the effects were trivial (mean absolute differences were ≤ 0.01 for COVAR and < 0.3 m for the height metrics). Forest attribute predictions using these and other metrics were also significantly affected (P < 0.05), namely gross merchantable volume (GMV), total volume (TVOL) and aboveground tree biomass (AGB) from L; and Lorey’s mean height (HGT), mean diameter at breast height (DBH), and GMV from H. We further demonstrated that combining ALS data from all available flight lines significantly increased errors for the predictions of HGT, GMV, and TVOL using L, and significantly reduced errors of HGT using H when compared to errors resulting from models developed with near-nadir data. While the differences in prediction errors were significant, they were small, with differences in mean absolute prediction errors all <1.3 per cent. Based on our results, we concluded that the effects of large scan angles, up to 30° off-nadir, on area-based forest attribute predictions were minimal in this study, which used ALS metrics calculated from ALS returns with a height above ground >2 m for balsam fir-dominated forests. This result may provide for operational efficiencies in implementing enhanced forest inventories in this particular forest environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueForestry An International Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207