MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Circadian Rhythm Does Not Alter the Sweating Response to Exercise in Thermoneutral and Warm Ambient Temperatures

2018· article· en· W3173175891 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nicholas Ravanelli, Pascal Imbeault, Ollie Jay

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermoregulationChemistryCircadian rhythmSWEATRelative humidityInternal medicineAnimal scienceCore temperatureHeart rateCycle ergometerEndocrinologyMedicineBlood pressureBiologyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study sought to determine whether the diurnal fluctuation in core temperature alters the sweating response to exercise in thermoneutral (23°C) and warm (33°C) environments. Six healthy males exercised on a semi‐recumbent ergometer at a fixed evaporative requirement for heat balance (200W/m 2 ) for 60 min at two different times of day and two ambient temperatures matched for absolute humidity (1.3 kPa); i) 0800h/23°C, ii) 0800h/33°C, iii) 1600h/23°C, and iv) 1600h/33°C. Esophageal temperature (T es ), mean body temperature (T b ), local sweat rate (LSR) measured at the arm and upper back, and whole body sweat loss (WBSL) were measured. Resting absolute T es was higher at 1600h compared to 0800h at 23°C (0800h: 36.7±0.2°C, 1600h: 36.9±0.2°C; P=0.04) and 33°C (0800h: 36.6±0.2°C, 1600h 36.9±0.2°C; P=0.005). Similarly, end‐exercise (steady‐state) absolute T es was higher at 1600h relative to 0800h at 23°C (0800h: 37.4±0.2°C, 1600h: 37.6±0.2°C; P=0.04) and 33°C (0800h: 37.0±0.2°C, 1600h 37.2±0.2°C; P=0.01). However the change in T es was similar irrespective of the time of day at both 23°C (0800h: 0.7±0.1°C, 1600h: 0.7±0.2°C; P=0.37) and 33°C (0800h: 0.4±0.1°C, 1600h: 0.3±0.1°C; P=0.35). Further, mean steady‐state LSR of arm and back after 60 min of exercise was similar irrespective of time at both 23°C (0800h: 0.66±0.06 mg/cm 2 /min, 1600h: 0.65±0.13 mg/cm 2 /min; P=0.74) and 33°C (0800h: 0.62±0.11 mg/cm 2 /min, 1600 h: 0.58±0.11 mg/cm 2 /min, P=0.50). Likewise, WBSL at steady‐state (46 to 60 min) was similar between morning and afternoon trials at 23°C (0800h: 156±28 g, 1600h: 162±36 g; P=0.38) and 33°C (0800h: 147±29 g, 1600h: 158±34 g, P=0.55). While sweating commenced prior to exercise in 33°C, the onset threshold for sweating occurred at a higher T b at 1600h compared to 800h at 23°C (0800h: 35.6±0.1°C, 1600h 35.9±0.2°C; P=0.03), however the change in T b was similar at 23°C regardless of time of day (0800h: 0.14±0.07°C, 1600h 0.17±0.12°C; P=0.47). Lastly, sudomotor thermosensitivity (LSR‐T b ) was similar at both 23°C (0800h: 0.80±0.26 mg/cm 2 /min/°C, 1600h: 0.82±0.30 mg/cm 2 /min/°C; P=0.80) and 33°C (0800h: 0.81±0.18 mg/cm 2 /min, 1600h: 0.90±0.40 mg/cm 2 /min, P=0.87). Taken together, preliminary data suggests the difference in absolute core temperature (~0.3°C) associated with diurnal fluctuation does not alter the sweating response at a fixed evaporative requirement for heat balance in both thermoneutral and warm conditions. Support or Funding Information N.R. was supported by an NSERC Postgraduate Scholarship‐Doctoral and a University of Ottawa Excellence Scholarship. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207