MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3173195446

Consumer Responses to Green Appeal Advertising: The Case of Korean and Canadian Consumers

2013· article· en· W3173195446 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue마케팅논집 · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdvertisingAppealBusinessMarketingPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

환경문제에 대한 소비자들의 관심이 높아짐에 따라 제품광고의 친환경소구 사용이 세계적으로 증가하고 있다. 그러나 친환경소구사용에 따른 소비자반응 연구는 문화적 차이를 거의 고려하지 않음으로써 타 문화권 소비자를 대상으로 한 광고효과에 대한 이해가 필요해지고 있다. 따라서 본 연구는 한국과 캐나다 소비자들로부터 친환경소구광고 효과를 조사하며 더 나아가 소비자 개인 특성, 즉 성별, 혼인 여부 및 지각된 소비자효과가 친환경소구사용에 따른 광고효과에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 탐색하였다. 실험결과에 따르면, 친환경소구광고가 비 환경소구광고보다 제품태도를 높일 수 있음을 한국소비자들로부터 발견하였으나, 동일한 효과가 캐나다소비자들에게서는 나타나지 않았다. 또한 친환경소구광고의 긍정적인 효과는 소비자의 성별에 의해 영향 받는 것으로 나타났으며, 다른 개인특성들의 조절효과는 한국과 캐나다소비자들에게서 다르게 나타나는 경향을 발견하였다. 본 연구는 국제광고캠페인에서 친환경소구의 효과적 사용에 대한 이해를 높이고 유용한 시사점을 제공하였다.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it