MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

NUTRIENTS ACUTELY MODULATE INTESTINAL PERMEABILITY INDEPENDENTLY OF THE ENTERIC NERVOUS SYSTEM

2018· article· en· W3173250629 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jean‐Baptiste Cavin, Wallace K. MacNaughton, Keith A. Sharkey

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnteric nervous systemIleumUssing chamberIntestinal permeabilityGlutamineTetrodotoxinStimulationJejunumVeratridineInternal medicineBiologyFructoseEndocrinologySmall intestineChemistryBiochemistrySodiumMedicineSodium channelAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background It is well known that diet profoundly affects intestinal physiology, with some diets contributing to a “leaky gut”, possibly promoting IBD and metabolic syndrome. Recently, several studies have suggested that the enteric nervous system, composed of neurons and glial cells, could be a potent regulator of intestinal permeability. We hypothesize that nutrients, sensed at the level of the epithelium, could trigger a neuroglial response to regulate intestinal permeability. Aims We investigated whether nutrients acutely modulate intestinal permeability at the level of the small intestine and if the enteric nervous system plays a role in this effect. Methods Intact jejunum and Ileum segments from CD1 mice were mounted in Ussing chambers. Transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) and short circuit current (Isc) were recorded for 50 min after stimulation with different nutrients. Two different size probes, 400 Da Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) or 4000 Da FITC‐Dextran (FD4), were used as markers of intestinal permeability. Apical glucose, fructose, glutamine (10 mM) or 5% Intralipid® were used as nutrient stimuli. Enteric neurons were either inhibited with tetrodotoxin (TTX, 0.5 μM) or activated with veratridine (10 μM). Enteric gliotransmission was inhibited with the connexin 43 blocker Gap26 (20 μM). Results The nutrients used in this study were “sensed” by the intestinal epithelium as illustrated by a rapid change in Isc following stimulation (+14, +7, −28 μA/cm2 for glucose, glutamine and Intralipid, respectively, in the jejunum; +132, +42, −14, −56 μA/cm2 for glucose, glutamine, fructose and Intralipid in the ileum). Addition of 5% Intralipid to the luminal side increased TER in both jejunum (+10 Ω/cm2) and Ileum (+10 Ω/cm2). Glutamine triggered a significant (p<0.05) increase of the transport of FITC across the intestine (+600% in jejunum and +60% in ileum after 50 minutes). On the other hand the transport of both FITC and FD4 was significantly reduced in the presence of Intralipid (−73% and −27%, respectively, in the jejunum and −74% and −31%, in the ileum). Results were similar when germ free mice were compared to conventionally raised mice. Neither the activation or inhibition of enteric neurons or the inhibition of gliotransmission affected TER or the transport of the fluorescent probes across the mouse intestine. Additionally, the use of the neuronal blocker, TTX, did not reverse the glutamine‐ or Intralipid‐induced alteration of FITC and FD4 transport across the intestine. Blocking the calcium‐sensing receptor did not alter the response to glutamine. Conclusions We have shown glutamine and Intralipid® to be potent regulators of intestinal permeability acting independently of the enteric nervous system, the microbiota, and the calcium‐sensing receptor. We are currently investigating the potential endocrine contribution to these effects. Support or Funding Information The work of Dr. Cavin was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Human Frontier Science Program Organization and Alberta innovates. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicGastrointestinal motility and disorders→French-language works237,207→