MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Productivity and parameters of ecological adaptability of alfalfa samples under the conditions of the South of Russia

2021· article· en· W3173252083 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAgrarian science · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptabilityProductivityBiologyTraitGenotypeAgricultureAgronomyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction . The initial material is the basis of the current breeding work with all agricultural crops, including alfalfa. The purpose of the conducted work is to estimate the productivity of alfalfa samples in the collection nursery, depending on the growing conditions and the identification of the most adapted samples according to the trait “green mass productivity”. Materials. The objects of the current study were 30 alfalfa samples (16 samples from Canada; 11 samples from the USA; 1 sample from Peru; 2 samples from France) from the collection ARIGCR named after N.I. Vavilov. Results. The estimation of alfalfa samples for the presence of adaptive properties based on the trait ‘green mass productivity’ showed that: — the genotypes К-27116, К-43269, К-43272, К-48771, К-48775, К-48776, К-50545, К-50561, К-45119 are more responsive to changes in environmental conditions; the genotypes К-32873, К-33299, К-42684, К-42249, К-47803 are characterized with a slight b i < 1 response to changes in environmental conditions; the genotypes К-36104, К-48778, К-42694, К-45715, К-47800, К-47801, К-47802, К-43260 are characterized with high stability to stresses; the genotypes К-43272, К-50545, К-47806, К-47807 are characterized with genetic adaptability; the genotypes К-36104, К-48778, К-48715, К-47800, К-43260 are characterized with more stability of response to changes in environmental conditions; the genotypes К-36104, К-48778, К-45715, К-47800, К-47801, К-47802, К-39978, К-43260 are characterized with great homeostasis (ecological adaptability).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.714
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it