MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3173259049 · doi:10.30996/exp.v18i1.5210

OPTIMASI PENGELOLAAN AIR BENDUNG CAWAK UNTUK DAERAH IRIGASI CAWAK DENGAN PROGRAM SOLVER (Studi kasus : Kemanteren Nglumber_Kecamatan Kepohbaru_Kabupaten Bojonegoro)

2021· article· en· W3173259049 on OpenAlexaff
Hudhiyantoro Hudhiyantoro, Bayu Aji Dwi Saputro

Bibliographic record

VenueEXTRAPOLASI · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMultimedia Learning Systems
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrrigationSowingEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)Drip irrigationCroppingForestryGeographyAgronomyEngineeringAgricultureBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractBendung Cawak is located in the district of Kepohbaru, Bojonegoro. Bendung Cawak is used for irrigation and water supplies of Kepohbaru, water availability is insufficient, while the amount of land and also residents who need water, so optimization Bendung Cawak is necessary for the water pitcher bendung can be optimized according to the needs.In this study, to maximize the area of land irrigated area to be optimized. In the optimization model used is the optimization of the monthly for 1 year by calculating the area of irrigated land available, land irrigation is met, the greater availability of water and irrigation needs are met. Optimization method used in this calculation is Program Solver.The results obtained by the reliable discharge available in the Cawak dam reservoir are 2.547 m3 / second. The need for irrigation water with the cropping pattern of Palawija-Padi-Padi at the beginning of planting in August I is 0.579 l / sec / ha as a planting plan with the minimum water requirements. As well as optimization, the optimum cropping pattern and initial planting are August I with the Palawija-Padi-Padi planting intensity 291% and with irrigation area MT I 675 ha, MT II 742 ha, MT III 742 ha. AbstrakBendung Cawak terletak di Kecamatan Kepohbaru, Kabupaten Bojonegoro. Layanan Bendung Cawak dipergunakan untuk keperluan irigasi di Daerah Irigasi Cawak Kecamatan Kepohbaru, ketersediaan air yang tidak mencukupi sedangkan banyaknya lahan yang membutuhkan air , sehingga Optimasi Bendung Cawak sangat diperlukan agar air tampungan Bendung dapat dioptimalkan sesuaidengan kebutuhan.Pada studi ini, untuk memaksimalkan luas lahan irigasi dilakukan optimasi luas lahan irigasi . Dalam model optimasi yang digunakan adalah optimasi satu bulanan selama 1 tahun dengan memperhitungkan luas lahan irigasi yang tersedia, luas lahan irigasi yang terpenuhi, besarnya ketersediaan debit air maksimal, dan kebutuhan air irigasi yang dipenuhi. Metode optimasi yang digunakan dalam perhitungan ini yaitu Program Solver.Hasil yang diperoleh debit andalan yang tersedia di tampungan bendung cawak adalah 2,547 m3/detik. kebutuhan air irigasi dengan pola tanam Palawija-Padi-Padi awal tanam Agustus I itu sebesar 0,579 lt/dtk/ha sebagai rencana tanam dengan kebutuhan air paling minimum.Serta optimasi didapatkan pola tanam dan awal tanam yang paling optimum adalah Agustus I dengan pola tanam Palawija-Padi-Padi intensitas tanam 291% dan dengan luas areal irigasi MT I 675 ha, MT II 742 ha, MT III 742 ha.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEXTRAPOLASISame topicMultimedia Learning SystemsFrench-language works237,207