Clinical and neurological evaluation following treatment with ultrasound and diathermy in dogs suffering from posterior paresis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study was conducted on twelve clinical cases of dogs irrespective of age, breed and sex suffering from posterior paresis.Male dogs were more affected (n=7) than females (n=5).Posterior paresis was observed highest in Mongrel (n=4) followed by Pomeranian and Labrador Retriever (n=3 each) breeds, respectively.Minimum occurrence was shown by German Shepherd and American Bully (n=1 each).Age-wise maximum hospital occurrence was observed in dogs of 1-3 years (n=6), while the minimum was found in less than 1 year and more than 3 years of age (n=3 each).Lateral and ventro-dorsal radiographs of the spine (lumbo-sacral area) were taken in all the animals to evaluate the involvement of vertebral bodies, but no orthopaedic abnormality detected responsible for posterior paresis.Numeric pain score was found to be reduced significantly after treatment in both the groups indicative of improvement in pain and hind limb weakness in dogs with posterior paresis.Further, shortwave diathermy was found to be more effective as compared to therapeutic ultrasound in the management of posterior paresis in dogs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".