MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Inferring high-resolution aquifer hydraulic conductivity and groundwater fluxes by active heat tracer using direct push fiber optics

2020· article· en· W3173282561 on OpenAlexaffabout
Cynthia Lee, Olivier Bour, Jean-Marc Ballard, Nataline Simon, Jérôme de La Bernardie, Daniel Paradis, Jasmin Raymond, René Lefebvre

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Waves and Analysis
Canadian institutionsGDG EnvironnementGeological Survey of CanadaInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAquiferHydrogeologyTRACERGroundwaterHydraulic conductivityAquifer propertiesGroundwater flowHydrology (agriculture)Groundwater modelSoil scienceGeologyEnvironmental scienceGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Characterizing aquifer heterogeneity for contaminant transport prediction remains a challenge in subsurface hydrology. In recent years, fiber optics (FO) Distributed Temperature Sensing (DTS) has enabled the study of transient hydrogeological processes with high spatial and temporal resolutions. Recent studies have shown that vertical profiles of groundwater fluxes can be quantified in granular aquifers through inversion of the thermal responses from active heat tracer tests using FO cables installed by direct push. Here, we further investigate the potential of active FO-DTS methods for granular aquifer characterization by performing a multiscale characterization and active heat tracer experiment in a well-characterized heterogeneous deltaic aquifer located north of Quebec City, Canada. This aquifer has been the object of detailed hydrogeological characterization and thus provides a wide range of existing data. In particular, we will test whether the vertical distribution of groundwater fluxes in the sub-surface determined by these inversions can be used to estimate hydraulic properties at a spatial scale that can be used to assess the impact of aquifer heterogeneity on mass transport and dispersion. This communication focuses on a site where two FO cables were installed 10 m apart by direct push. An active heat tracer experiment was carried out with the two FO cables, and the resulting thermal responses were inverted to obtain high-resolution vertical profiles of the groundwater fluxes at each FO cable. Heating was carried out in the saturated zone, between depths of 12 to 40 m with a 25-cm vertical sampling. Using data from a piezometric survey, the groundwater fluxes from the FO-DTS were used to estimate a range of hydraulic conductivities (K). A previous study at the field site has shown that cone penetration test (CPT) profiles can be used to recognize the different hydrofacies with distinct ranges of hydraulic conductivity present in the deltaic aquifer. As the two FO cables were co-located with a previously done CPT profile, the measured fluxes and estimated K values could be compared to known ranges of K. Results show quite varying temperature profiles and accordingly distinct groundwater fluxes. These varying fluxes are coherently correlated to the different hydrofacies identified with the co-located CPT responses at a similar vertical scale. The two FO-DTS temperature profiles are also quite similar when considering the small variations in hydrofacies found along their length. These results show that FO-DTS heat tracer tests provide consistent and representative measurements of groundwater fluxes in agreement with the heterogeneous distribution of K as indicated by CPT. Thus, compared with existing hydraulic methods, FO-DTS heat tracer tests provide new and complementary data that have a great potential for characterizing solute transport in granular aquifers with a high spatial resolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Waves and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207