Pre-construction Apartment sales and Assignment-approach with Canadian System
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to derive the shortcomings and to enhance the pre-construction apartment sales and assignment system in Korea through a comparative analysis of the Canadian system. In particular, all the element of the new home warranty insurance should be in the arms reach of the public and be detailed. As a result, the recruitment advertizement differs depending on the social environment of each country. The developers have responsibilities and obligations to recruit, but the assignment is legally prohibited in Korea. The resale of the right to occupancy or move-in the pre-construction apartment still exists and some of real estate agents were said to be arrested because of the illegal assignments. It needs that the assignment be allowed with the proper procedure including the Agreement form be prepared by the company and be signed by both the assignor and assignee and the real estate agents(if needs) as well, and to be approved by the developer. The gain shall be exposed and subjected to the special income tax. With respect to the new home warranty, the warranty company should prepare guideline booklets in order for the ordinary people can review and understand what components and works are included in the new home warranty programs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it