«NATIONAL IN FORM, PROLETARIAN IN CONTENT»: PROJECT OF THE ORGANIZATION OF THE АLL-CRIMEAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF NATIONAL-CULTURAL CONSTRUCTION AND LOCAL HISTORY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The author studies and analyzes the process of reorganization of the Crimean research institute and the creation of the All-Crimean research institute of national-cultural construction and local history on its basis in 1932. Previously unpublished archival documents identified in the funds of the State Archive of the Russian Federation have been put into scientific circulation. The study uses little-known materials from the newspaper «Red Crimea», which allow us to fill the process of transformation of Soviet social and cultural life in the first half of the 30s of the twentieth century with factual content. The role of the teaching staff of the Crimean State Pedagogical Institute named after M. V. Frunze in the creation, development and activity of the institution is shown. The work plans of the Institute’s sectors and sections for the fourth quarter of 1932, as well as the influence of the People’s Commissariat of the RSFSR on the successful functioning of the organization, are considered in detail.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".