MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3173313286 · doi:10.1002/uog.23725

Emerging tool for assessment of left ventricular–arterial coupling after pre‐eclampsia

2021· letter· en· W3173313286 on OpenAlexaff
Edoardo Sciatti, Rossana Orabona, Enrico Vizzardi

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2021
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsSurgical Specialties (Canada)
FundersUniversità degli Studi di Brescia
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineArterial stiffnessPopulationSpeckle tracking echocardiographyDiastoleLeft ventricular hypertrophyHeart failureBlood pressureEjection fraction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

History of pre-eclampsia (PE) is a cardiovascular (CV) risk factor, associated with the development of CV disease later in life, when compared with the general female population matched for age. In order to further analyze this epidemiological link, we enrolled 60 women with a pregnancy complicated by PE (30 with early-onset PE and 30 with late-onset PE), 6 months to 4 years after delivery, and 30 healthy controls. The major strength of our investigation was that a study cohort without CV risk factors was selected in order to avoid bias. Cases and controls were evaluated comprehensively and contemporaneously by peripheral arterial tonometry (EndoPAT-2000, Itamar Medical Ltd, Caesarea, Israel), vascular plethysmography (Vascular Explorer, Enverdis GmbH, Jena, Germany) and echocardiography (traditional tissue Doppler imaging, speckle tracking and integrated backscatter). To summarize, we demonstrated that women with a history of PE, particularly those who experienced early-onset disease, had an increased incidence of endothelial dysfunction (37–77%, depending on the method)1, arterial stiffness (10–57%, depending on the method)1, concentric left ventricular (LV) remodeling (60%) with abnormally high LV mass (52%)2, 3, diastolic dysfunction (10% Grade I)3, myocardial impairment (53% for LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), 23% for LV radial two-dimensional strain, 33% for LV circumferential two-dimensional strain, 20% for LV torsion, 10% for left atrial strain and 23% for right ventricular strain)3, 4 and LV and aortic fibrosis1. These findings led us to hypothesize that the CV sequelae of PE may be considered a phenotype of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), as we have discussed elsewhere1. Indeed, as commonly seen in HFpEF patients, ventricular–arterial coupling (VAC), calculated by Chen's method5, was within the normal range in the early-onset PE group, although it was significantly greater than that in the late-onset PE group and controls3. Furthermore, both of its components (i.e. aortic elastance (Ea) and LV end-systolic elastance (Ees)) were abnormal in approximately half of the cases with previous early-onset PE (Table 1)3. Interestingly, Ikonomidis et al. proposed recently a new promising marker to assess VAC itself, namely the ratio of carotid–femoral pulse-wave velocity (cfPWV) to GLS6. The main advantage of this marker is that cfPWV and GLS are optimal markers with which to assess arterial stiffness and myocardial performance, respectively, and are prognostic factors for CV events. In addition, while Ea and Ees increase concomitantly in HFpEF, leading to a ‘normal’ ratio, cfPWV increases while GLS decreases (as an absolute value), resulting in a greater absolute value of their ratio6. On the other hand, this method could become more expensive and time-consuming because the use of two non-invasive devices would be required to obtain VAC. Applying the new formula to our cohort, we found significantly impaired VAC in the early-onset PE group compared with the late-onset PE group and controls (Table 1). In addition, the two methods to calculate VAC correlated with each other (r = 0.465; P < 0.001). On the contrary, cfPWV/GLS was correlated more strongly with several vascular, biventricular and left atrial parameters than was Ea/Ees (Table 2). These data are consistent with those reported by Ikonomidis et al., who found that cfPWV/GLS, but not Ea/Ees, is related to impaired carotid intima–media thickness, coronary-flow reserve and LV diastolic dysfunction6. Larger studies are needed to validate this novel and promising parameter, which underlines the complex interplay between the heart and the vascular system. Our data reinforce that women with a history of PE represent a high-risk group and may benefit from closer follow-up. Data available on request from the authors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207