MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reduction of plasma angiopoietin‐like 2 after cardiac surgery is related to tissue inflammation and senescence status of patients

2019· article· en· W3173317657 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Pauline Labbé, Pierre‐Emmanuel Noly, Nathalie Thorin‐Trescases, Annik Fortier, Albert Nguyen, Michel Carrier, Éric Thorin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipid metabolism and disorders
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineBasal (medicine)AdipokineInflammationCardiac surgeryAdipose tissueInternal medicineArterySurgeryCardiologyPathologicalGastroenterologyObesityInsulin resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction A strong positive relationship has been reported in humans between high levels of circulating angiopoietin‐like 2 (ANGPTL2), a pro‐inflammatory adipokine, and cardiovascular diseases (CVD). ANGPTL2 levels can predict the incidence of CVD, but whether a cardiac surgery such as a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), aortic valve replacement or both, is able to modulate ANGPTL2 levels is unknown. Hypothesis Cardiac surgery alleviates cardiac stress and lowers ANGPTL2 circulating levels. Methods In patients undergoing CABG (n=16), valve replacement (n=16), or both (n=15), blood was taken before surgery and 24h, 4±1 days (hospital discharge) and 60±30 days (follow‐up visit) post‐surgery to quantify plasma levels of ANGPTL2 and plasma hs‐CRP levels. Mediastinal adipose tissue (MAT) and internal mammary fragments (IMA) were dissected out during surgery, RNA extracted and gene expression assessed by quantitative RT‐PCR. Results The type of surgery had no impact on the overall profile of plasma ANGPTL2 or hs‐CRP levels post‐surgery. Both markers rose transiently after 24h and returned progressively to baseline levels. However, we observed two different patterns for ANGPTL2: compared to basal values, levels either decreased in 45% (DECREASED group, n=21) or increased in 55% (INCREASED group, n=26) of the patients at the end of the follow‐up (p<0.001). In contrast, hs‐CRP levels were identical between these two groups (p=0.9967). Patients in the INCREASED group were 8 years older (p=0.002), had a higher systolic blood pressure (p=0.038), and they received 20 times more (p<0.0001) noradrenaline 24h after the surgery, suggesting a higher inflammatory response to the surgery. In addition, patients in the INCREASED group tended to develop more acute atrial fibrillation (35% vs . 14% incidence; p=0.112) than patients in the DECREASED group. Changes in plasma ANGPTL2 levels (ΔANGPTL2=final‐initial levels) positively correlated with the mRNA expression of the inflammatory markers TNF‐α and IL‐8 in both MAT and IMA at baseline (p<0.05) and with the senescence‐associated marker p21 in IMA (p=0.009). In other words, high pre‐operative markers of inflammation and senescence were associated with an INCREASED in ANGPTL2 post‐operatively. Conclusion Changes in ANGPTL2 blood levels discriminate between two types of patients depending on known pre‐operative characteristics (age, blood pressure) and unknown inflammatory and senescent status. In younger patients with lower cardiac adipose tissue inflammation and arterial senescence load, ANGPTL2, but not hs‐CRP levels, decreased following cardiac surgery. A higher ANGPTL2 levels post‐cardiac surgery could potentially contribute to cardiovascular events such as atrial fibrillation. Altogether, our data suggest that circulating ANGPTL2 reflects tissue inflammation and senescence. Support or Funding Information This work was funded by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP 133649 and 14496) (ET) and by the Foundation of the Montreal Heart Institute (ET, MC). This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicLipid metabolism and disordersFrench-language works237,207