MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Deficiency of Leukocyte‐Specific Protein 1 (LSP1) Alleviates Asthma in a Mouse Model

2018· article· en· W3173361465 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nguyen Phuong Khanh Le, A. C. B Nascimento, David Schneberger, Chi Cuong Quach, Xiaobei Zhang, Wojciech Dawicki, Lixin Liu, John Gordon, Baljit Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsthmaImmunologyInflammationLungImmune systemIntraperitoneal injectionImmunohistochemistryWestern blotPathologyBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asthma is one of the most serious forms of respiratory disease, causing economic losses, high mortality, and morbidity globally. However, its etiology is still ambiguous. Many inflammatory cells, including T lymphocytes, eosinophils, mast cells, macrophages, and neutrophils, are recruited into the airway of asthma lung patients. In the previous study, we reported that LSP1 deficiency reduces neutrophil migration and acute lung inflammation, but its role in asthma remains unknown. Therefore, in this study, we developed an asthma‐like disease in LSP1‐deficient ( Lsp1 −/− ) and wild‐type (WT) 129/SvJ mice (n=6 each treatment group) through two intraperitoneal (IP) injections of 2μg OVA/2mg alum two weeks apart, followed by three aerosol challenges with 1% OVA two days apart after two weeks of the last IP injection. We hypothesized that the absence of LSP1 inhibited airway inflammation in this OVA‐induced asthma mouse model due to inhibition of immune cell migration. Immunohistochemistry staining and western blot data showed that the level of LSP1 increased in asthma mouse lungs, compared with normal healthy lungs. Results from immuno‐gold as well as immunofluorescent staining illustrated that LSP1 was expressed on endothelium, bronchiolar epithelium, neutrophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes, alveolar macrophages, and pulmonary intravascular macrophages. There was no significant difference in peripheral leukocyte numbers between normal and asthmatic WT and Lsp1 −/− mice. However, compared to Lsp1 −/− asthma mice, WT asthma mice had higher levels leukocytes in broncho‐alveolar lavage fluid, higher myeloperoxidase, a marker of neutrophils, and eosiperoxidase levels in lungs (P<0.05). The level of OVA‐specific IgE, but not IgA and IgG1, in the serum of WT asthma mice was higher than that of Lsp1 −/− asthma mice (P<0.05). Other research reported that IL‐4, IL‐5, IL‐6, IL‐13, and KC are associated with eosinophilia and neutrophil migration. We found that the absence of the LSP1 gene significantly reduced the levels of IL‐4, IL‐5, IL‐6, IL‐13, and KC (P<0.05) but not the levels of IL‐17, eotaxin, IFN‐gamma, and total protein in broncho‐alveolar lavage fluid. The airway hyper‐responsiveness response to methacholine in Lsp1 −/− asthma mice was ameliorated compared to WT asthma mice (P<0.05). Histopathology evaluation findings showed more recruited inflammatory cells, as well as airway and blood vessel wall thickening, in the lungs of WT mice than in those of Lsp1 −/− mice. These data indicate that LSP1 promotes airway inflammation associated with asthma in this mouse model. LSP1 may be a potential target for therapeutic intervention in allergic lung disease or asthma in humans. Support or Funding Information We thank to the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), Graduate Student Scholarship from Integrated Training Program in Infectious Disease, Food Safety and Public Policy (ITraP), Devolved Graduate Scholarship from Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, and Graduate Student Scholarship from Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Canada for supporting this research. We thank Ms. LaRhonda Sobchishin for the technical support provided for the electron microscope technique and Ms. Eiko Kawamura for technical support in using a confocal microscope. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→