Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study aims to analyze the stock valuation of construction issuers, especially BUMN Karya using data for the first quarter – third quarter of 2020 obtained from financial statements. The ratio used is the valuation ratio such as Price to Book Value and Price to Earning to Share. The solvency ratio used is the Debt to Equity Ratio and the market cap value. The three construction issuers that are the focus of the analysis are PT Waskita Karya (WSKT), Tbk, PT Wijaya Karya, Tbk (WIKA) and PT. Pembangunan Perumahan, Tbk (PTPP). From the results of the analysis obtained in the third quarter of 2020, WSKT has a value of PBV 0.84, PER -7.56, DER 3.87 with a Market Cap of 19.9T. WIKA has a value of PBV 1.00, PER 320.79, DER 2.80 and Market Cap 16.1T. while PTPP, has PBV 0.66, PER 358.82, DER 2.79, Market Cap 9.4T. among the three issuers, WSKT has a negative value due to having a corrected profit in the third quarter of 2020. While the lowest PBV is owned by PTPP while the highest DER is owned by WSKT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".