Foreign Object Detection of Wireless Power Transfer System Using Sensor Coil
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wireless Power Transfer (WPT) system are used in many areas due to their advantages such as safety, aesthetics, and convenience. The WPT system are being applied not only smartphones that are common around us, but also to various electronics and medical devices. In particular, in the case of Electric Vehicle (EV), researches are steadily underway to apply the WPT system to solve the problem of battery dependence. Inductive power transfer (IPT) is the most popular WPT method to transfer power using the magnetic field. However, Foreign Object (FO) in WPT system can be heated by strong magnetic field and can lead to fires. Also, it can reduce power transfer efficiency. The risk of fire in a WPT system such as EVs, which require large power, is a major obstacle. Therefore, FO detection method is necessary for the safety and good performance. In this paper, we propose a Foreign Object Detection method using sensor coils. The proposed method is simple and shows the good performance compared with conventional method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it