ВІД ЕТНІЧНОГО ДО ТРАНСНАЦІОНАЛЬНОГО: УКРАЇНСЬКА КАНАДСЬКА ЛІТЕРАТУРА В ПОШУКАХ ДОМУ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article researches the specificity of the formation of national identity in different generations of Canadians of Ukrainian origin and peculiarities of the representation of plural identity in the artistic space of works by Ukrainian Canadian authors. Identity models, which are described by Ukrainian Canadian authors, have signs of transience, change, and borderless.The purpose of the investigation is to find out the specifics of the formation of a national identity (in its relations with other modes) in different generations of Canadians of Ukrainian origin and the peculiarities of the expression of multiple identities in the artistic space of the works by Ukrainian Canadian authors; study of the presented problems of the crisis of personal identity in the English-speaking Ukrainian Canadian literature and the ways to overcome it by the authors.The key to overcoming the crisis of personal identity for word artists is the question of redefining the mental location of the house. Home is a fundamental factor in the formation / (re)construction of a national identity for a community that has been detached from its nation and tries to take root in another‟s socio-cultural space. The home serves as a symbol of belonging, the rooting of the people, a peculiar marker of the acquisition / loss of the homeland. The uncertainty of the mental location of the home of Ukrainian Canadian authors causes identity erosion and, as a result, leads to permanent fluctuations between two cultures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".