MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Antigen‐Induced Arthritis Leads to Depression‐Like Behavior in Mice Mediated by Central TNFα

2019· article· en· W3173535089 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Fernando Vicentini, Fernando Lopes, Nina L. Cluny, Alex J. Mathews, Benjamin H. Lee, Wagdi Almishri, Lateece Griffin, Nicole Munsie, Mark G. Swain, Simon A. Hirota, Keith A. Sharkey

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicStress Responses and Cortisol
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsMedicineInflammationRheumatoid arthritisCytokineImmune systemArthritisImmunologyDepression (economics)Tumor necrosis factor alphaAntigenTail suspension testInternal medicineBehavioural despair testHippocampus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a relapsing inflammatory condition of the joints. There are many debilitating neurological and psychological manifestations associated with RA, including chronic pain, and depression. These symptoms contribute to a reduction of quality of life, particularly because they are often present when the peripheral disease is in remission. While progress has been made in the treatment of joint inflammation, mechanisms that underlie the central neural manifestations of RA have yet to be characterized and treatment options identified. Using a mouse model of RA, we sought to demonstrate depression‐like behaviour in the absence of joint inflammation and determine a mechanism for this condition. We hypothesized that inflammation would lead to depression‐like behaviour mediated by central cytokines. To test the hypothesis, we used the antigen‐induced arthritis (AIA) model in mice. C57Bl/6 male mice (8–10 wk) were sensitized with methylated bovine serum albumin (mBSA) 14 days prior to the immune challenge. Knee intra‐articular injection of mBSA was performed to induce joint inflammation. After 1 or 13 days, mice were subjected to the tail suspension test to evaluate the presence of depression‐like behavior and pain was assessed with a Von Frey apparatus. To evaluate the inflammatory state of the brain, multiplex cytokine analysis (32 cytokines) were performed in hippocampal specimens and microglial staining was performed using anti‐Iba‐1 antibodies. Anti‐TNFα injections were performed intracerebroventricularly (icv) to evaluate to role of this cytokine on behaviour. One day after immune challenge, joint inflammation was observed in the knee. After 13 days, no neutrophil infiltration was observed, suggesting a basal, non‐inflamed state. We observed high levels of pain on day 1, which persisted until day 13. Depression‐like behaviour was only seen on day 13, suggesting an alteration in behavior in the absence of knee inflammation. To validate this result, mice with AIA were treated with the antidepressant imipramine (30 mg/kg). We saw a reduction in the depression‐like behavior previously observed. Moreover, to rule out joint pain on the behavior reported, we treated AIA mice locally with the non‐opioid analgesic dipyrone. Reducing joint pain did not influence the depression‐like behavior. Microglia analysis on the hippocampus showed no overt activation of microglia at either time point. Cytokine analysis showed an increase in KC, MCP‐1, and TNFα (p=0.08) in the hippocampus of AIA mice after day 1, but no changes at day 13. In order to test if TNFα may be involved in the depression behaviour, we injected anti‐TNFα icv on day 0. At day 13, we observed a reduction of depression‐like behaviour in AIA mice, suggesting a role for TNFα on this outcome. We conclude that depression‐like behaviour in a mouse model of RA is mediated by central cytokines. The mechanism of how TNFα is modulating this behavior remains to be determined. Support or Funding Information This work was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq – Brazil). This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicStress Responses and Cortisol→French-language works237,207→