MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3173545055 · doi:10.1089/brain.2021.0015

A Wavelet-Based Approach for Estimating Time-Varying Connectivity in Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

2021· article· en· W3173545055 on OpenAlexaff
Antonis Savva, George K. Matsopoulos, Georgios D. Mitsis

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Connectivity · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Institute of Mental Health
KeywordsDynamic functional connectivityWaveletFunctional magnetic resonance imagingCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)Pattern recognition (psychology)Nuclear magnetic resonanceMathematicsComputer scienceStatisticsArtificial intelligenceNeurosciencePsychologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The selection of an appropriate window size, window function, and functional connectivity (FC) metric in the sliding window method is not straightforward due to the absence of ground truth. Methods: A previously proposed wavelet-based method was accordingly adjusted for estimating time-varying FC (TVFC) and was applied to a large high-quality, low-motion dataset of 400 resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data. Specifically, the wavelet coherence magnitude and relative phase were averaged across wavelet (frequency) scales to yield TVFC and synchronization patterns. To assess whether the observed fluctuations in TVFC were statistically significant (dynamic FC [dFC]; the distinction between TVFC and dFC is intentional), surrogate data were generated using the multivariate phase randomization (MVPR) and multivariate autoregressive randomization (MVAR) methods to define the null hypothesis of dFC absence. Results: By averaging across all frequencies, core regions of the default mode network (DMN; medial prefrontal and posterior cingulate cortices, inferior parietal lobes, hippocampal formation) were found to exhibit dFC (test–retest reproducibility of 90%) and were also synchronized in activity (−15° ≤ phase ≤15°). When averaging across distinct frequency bands, the same dynamic connections were identified, with the majority of them identified in the frequency range (0.01, 0.198) Hz, though with lower test–retest reproducibility (<66%). Additional analysis suggested that MVPR method better preserved properties (p < 10−10), including time-averaged coherence, of the original data compared with MVAR approach. Conclusions: The wavelet-based approach identified dynamic associations between the core DMN regions with fewer choices in parameters, compared with sliding window method. We employed a wavelet-based method, previously used in the literature, and proposed modifications to assess time-varying functional connectivity in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. With this approach, dynamic connections within the default mode network were identified, involving the medial prefrontal and posterior cingulate cortices, inferior parietal lobes, and hippocampal formation, which were also highly consistent in test–retest analysis (test–retest reproducibility of 90%), without the need to select window size, window function, and functional connectivity metric as with the sliding window method, whereby no consensus on the appropriate choices of hyperparameters currently exists in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.115
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.115
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain ConnectivitySame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207