PBP4-mediated β-lactam resistance among clinical strains of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: PBP4, a low-molecular-weight PBP in Staphylococcus aureus, is not considered to be a classical mediator of β-lactam resistance. Previous studies carried out by our group with laboratory strains of S. aureus demonstrated the ability of PBP4 to produce β-lactam resistance through mutations associated with the pbp4 promoter and/or gene. Recent studies of β-lactam-resistant clinical isolates of S. aureus have reported similar mutations associated with pbp4. OBJECTIVES: To determine if pbp4-associated mutations reported among clinical strains of S. aureus mediate β-lactam resistance. METHODS: The pbp4 promoters and genes bearing mutations from clinical isolates were cloned into a heterologous host. Reporter, growth and Bocillin assays were performed to assess their role in β-lactam resistance. X-ray crystallography was used to obtain acyl-enzyme intermediate structures of the WT and mutant PBP4 with nafcillin and cefoxitin. RESULTS: Of the five strains that contained pbp4 promoter mutations, three strains exhibited enhanced expression of PBP4. The R200L mutation in pbp4 resulted in increased survival in the presence of the β-lactams nafcillin and cefoxitin. Further, introduction of either a promoter or a gene mutation into the genome of a WT host increased the ability of the strains to resist the action of β-lactams. The four high-resolution X-ray structures presented demonstrate the binding pose of the β-lactams tested and provide hints for further drug development. CONCLUSIONS: Mutations associated with the pbp4 promoter and pbp4 gene altered protein activity and mediated β-lactam resistance among the clinically isolated strains that were studied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".