Three-Dimensional Animated Model of Abomasal Displacement and Volvulus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Displacement and volvulus of the abomasum is commonly seen by every bovine practitioner working in a dairy practice. Understanding the anatomy and position of the abomasum is now second nature for people with experience. Veterinarians have to remember their old days in the classroom when the teacher was trying to explain how the abomasum was moving around in the abdomen. It takes a lot of experiences, sometimes acquired the hard way, to understand the topography of abomasal displacement or volvulus. Three-dimensional (3-D) modelization and animation have been used in movies and videogames for a while. Recently, the advances of software and computer capacity have enabled more complex animation with non-geometrical form, like organs of living species. The resulting computer-generated images have progressed so significantly that they are not easily distinguished from reality. Three-dimensional (3-D) modelization and animation is a useful tool to explain complex phenomena, and abomasal volvulus is one of them. Our goal was to create a 3-D model of abomasal displacement and volvulus as a teaching tool for veterinary students.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".