Bibliographic record
Abstract
First published in England under the title Illumination, Harold Frederic’s novel The Damnation of Theron Ware has long been considered in terms of its Americanness. Frederic’s 1896 portrayal of a small-town Methodist minister in upstate New York has been praised for its authentic regional depiction, as well as its engagement with changing national demographics and portrayal of the American Methodist church. Yet Illumination’s place in the tradition of British clerical novels has largely been overlooked. In addition to dramatizing the character and calling of the clergyman, clerical novels addressed the social place of the minister and the obligations of the profession in nations that considered themselves to be Christian. Congregational expectations, financial strain, personal ambition, and crises of belief all impact the effective ministry of the clergyman in these novels. This essay expands the critical emphasis which has tended to see Frederic’s novel as particularly American, placing Illumination in context with novels by Trollope, Oliphant, Barrie, and others, as well as in context with authors of 19th century ministerial handbooks. In so doing, it calls for a heightened appreciation of the complexity and achievement of Frederic’s best-known work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".