MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3173679285 · doi:10.1353/rel.2018.0028

Illumination: Harold Frederic’s American Clerical Novel

2018· article· en· W3173679285 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kristina L. Hochwender

Bibliographic record

VenueReligion & literature · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDamnationContext (archaeology)DepictionCharacter (mathematics)Christian ministryHistoryClassicsReligious studiesSociologyLiteratureArtLawPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

First published in England under the title Illumination, Harold Frederic’s novel The Damnation of Theron Ware has long been considered in terms of its Americanness. Frederic’s 1896 portrayal of a small-town Methodist minister in upstate New York has been praised for its authentic regional depiction, as well as its engagement with changing national demographics and portrayal of the American Methodist church. Yet Illumination’s place in the tradition of British clerical novels has largely been overlooked. In addition to dramatizing the character and calling of the clergyman, clerical novels addressed the social place of the minister and the obligations of the profession in nations that considered themselves to be Christian. Congregational expectations, financial strain, personal ambition, and crises of belief all impact the effective ministry of the clergyman in these novels. This essay expands the critical emphasis which has tended to see Frederic’s novel as particularly American, placing Illumination in context with novels by Trollope, Oliphant, Barrie, and others, as well as in context with authors of 19th century ministerial handbooks. In so doing, it calls for a heightened appreciation of the complexity and achievement of Frederic’s best-known work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.805

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReligion & literatureSame topicAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207