MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Differential Regulation of β‐cell Function by Tonically‐active and Receptor‐activated Gα <sub>z</sub> : Implications for β‐cell Compensation and Failure

2019· article· en· W3173688066 on OpenAlexaff
Michael D. Schaid, J. Timothy Harrington, Grant M. Kelly, Kathyrn Carbajal, Michelle E. Kimple

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsInternal medicineEndocrinologyReceptorInsulinBiologyChemistryCell biologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adenylate cyclase(AC) synthesizes the second messenger molecule, cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). In the insulin‐secreting β‐cell of the pancreatic islet, cAMP has critical roles in glucose‐stimulated insulin secretion and β‐cell replication. The G protein α‐subunit, Gα z , has partial tonic inhibitory activity towards AC. Our previous work has confirmed Gα z ‐null mice secrete more insulin and are resistant to glucose intolerance via a significant increase in b‐cell mass. Gα z an also be activated by E‐prostanoid receptor 3 (EP3), a GPCR for the arachidonic acid metabolite, PGE2. Islets from diabetic mice and humans produce more PGE2 and express more EP3 than those from WT controls, while a EP3 antagonist restores insulin secretion. To determine the mechanisms behind the negative regulation of b‐cell function and replication by Ga z , we developed a β‐cell‐specific, cAMP biosensor expressed in intact islets, confirming, for the first time, an inverse relationship between β‐cell cAMP and Ca 2+ oscillations. Loss of Gα z has the expected effects on basal β‐cell cAMP levels, and in response to an agonist of the cAMP‐stimulatory glucagon‐like peptide 1 (GLP‐1) receptor. Consistent with a lack of EP3 expression in islets from lean mice, neither agonists nor antagonists of the EP3 receptor have any effects on β‐cell cAMP, Ca 2+ , or the coordination between the two, regardless of Gα z expression. C57BL/6J Lep ob (B6‐Ob) mice are a model of β‐cell compensation. We have shown the EP3:Gα z pathway is up‐regulated in B6‐Ob islets; raising the question as to whether up‐regulation of the this pathway is dysfunctional or beneficial. Here, we confirm B6‐Ob cAMP production and Ca 2+ oscillations are up‐regulated as compared to WT mice. In addition, the anti‐phase relationship between cAMP and Ca 2+ is lost as a result of reduce phosphodiesterase 1A expression. These results are also consistent with saturation of Ca 2+ ‐regulatable AC isozymes. The EP3 agonist, sulprostone, had no effect on cAMP levels, but blocked Ca 2+ influx, suggesting divergent signaling mechanisms between tonically‐active Gα z and receptor‐activated Gα z . The ability of activated Gα z to bind to Rap1GAP, sequestering it from AC, yields a hypothesis for this signaling divergence. Our current model is that cAMP signaling up‐regulated in the compensating β‐cell, ensures Rap1GAP is inactive towards Rap1, allowing Rap1 to promote cAMP‐mediated effects on exocytosis and β‐cell replication while serving as a sink for activated Gα z , inhibiting its action on AC isoforms critical for β‐cell function and mass. Support or Funding Information I01 BX003700‐01A1, VA BLR&D; R01 DK102598, NIH/NIDDK; and ADA Innovative Basic Science Award 1‐14‐BS‐115 This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicPancreatic function and diabetes→French-language works237,207→