Examining the Correlation Between Cellular and Gross Morphological Changes In the Developing Mouse Skull
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The mammalian skull develops from intramembranous and endochondral ossification. Thus, differentiation and proliferation of osteoblasts and chondrocytes play an integral role in skull development and the resulting morphology. While this connection between cellular behaviour and morphology is intuitive, the relationship between changes at the cellular level and gross phenotypic changes in the skull are still poorly understood. In this study we ask: How do changes in osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation and proliferation within facial sutures and cranial base synchondroses affect the gross morphology of the mouse skull? We use a mutant mouse model (Cx43 I130T/+ ) wherein the GJA1 gene encoding for the gap junctional protein Connexin43 has been mutated, reducing gap junctional conductance by 50%. Cx43 is critical in bone development, and is known to stimulate osteoblast differentiation. Presently, the literature is vague surrounding the effects of Cx43 on chondrocytes. Cx43 I130T/+ mice display craniofacial anomalies, such as smaller facial bones, elongated nasal cartilages and microcephaly. Preliminary data from our lab shows that the cranial base is also altered in Cx43 I130T/+ adult mice. We predict that these morphological changes in the face and cranial base will be mirrored by altered cellular behaviour in the facial sutures and cranial base synchondroses. METHODS Skulls of P0 Cx43 I130T/+ mice and their wildtype (WT) littermates were imaged using μ‐CT. Three‐dimensional landmarks were collected from scans and differences in shape were analyzed using geometric morphometrics. Paraffin sections were taken from skulls of each genotype and stained for histomorphometry and markers of cell proliferation and osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation. Measures of cell density were collected for facial sutures and cranial base synchondroses and compared between groups. RESULTS While we found no significant differences in skull size between genotypes, we did find significant shape differences. Mutant mice have proportionately smaller facial bones and orbits and relatively larger basicrania compared to WT mice. Mutant skulls are also severely under‐mineralized. There is no difference in osterix‐positive cell density in facial sutures between groups, but we did find an altered pattern of osteocalcin expression in mutant facial sutures. Total area of each synchondrosis is similar for both genotypes, but there are significant differences in resting zone area of each synchondrosis between groups. Cell density of Sox9‐positive cells within the synchondroses are the same for mutant and WT mice. CONCLUSIONS Our shape analyses indicate that the morphological changes observed in adult Cx43 I130T/+ mice are present at birth. While we did find some differences in osteoblast and chondrocyte profiles between groups, the link between cellular changes at the tissue level and gross phenotypic changes is not straightforward. Support or Funding Information This work is supported by NSERC. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".