MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Identification of the immediate precursors of tumor dendritic cells

2008· article· en· W3173745805 on OpenAlexaff
Jun Diao, Erin Winter, Mark S. Cattral

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStromal cellCD11cBiologyPopulationBone marrowMHC class IICancer researchCell biologyImmunologyAntigenPhenotypeMajor histocompatibility complexMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ontogeny of dendritic cells (DC) in tumors remains unclear. Our previous studies have shown that conventional DC (cDC) in murine lymphoid tissue and bone marrow arise from a distinct population of CD11c(+) MHC class II(−)lineage(−) immediate precursors, which are now known as pre‐cDC. In this study, we show that pre‐cDC are a key source of DC in experimental murine tumors. Pre‐cDC from tumors are replication‐competent and generate homogeneous cDC that continue to divide for several generations when co‐cultured on a supportive stromal monolayer. Adoptively transferred pre‐cDC, but not monocytes, generate DC in tumors. In vivo bromodeoxyuridine incorporation studies reveal that endogenous pre‐cDC and cDC are actively replicating in tumors. The chemokine, CCL3, was found to play a critical role in promoting pre‐cDC migration into tumors from the circulation. Collectively, our findings provide evidence of a distinct development pathway for cDC in tumors and highlight the importance of in situ replication of pre‐cDC and cDC in their expansion. The identification of this pathway is an important step in addressing how tumor microenvironments influence the developmental fate and function of DC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses→French-language works237,207→