Diagnosis of the Levelsof Social Competence Among Elementary School Pupils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article considers the issue of social competence. The structure of social competence and the model of its measurement are offered. The authors stress that the first phase of forming the foundations of a child's social competence is his family. However,later it becomes its educational space, so the authors consider its important to measure the level of this competence during the educational process.Presented the diagnosis of the level of social competence among elementary school pupils(7−8 years), 402children and 16 teachers took part in the formative experiment. Based on the diagnosis Assessment of Social Competence(ASC): A scale of social competence functions(1985)(adapted to national values and the age of primary school pupils), it was found that it exceeds the initial and intermediate level of social competence with the most developed function of caring thinking. Which is natural for this age group. However, the understanding of social reality and the cessation of egocentrism showed the greatest indicators at the initial level of social competence, which indicates one of the areas of work in forming the foundations of this competence and indicates a purposeful process of education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".