MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Persistent Left Ventricular Diastolic Stiffening Despite Cessation of Intermittent Myocardial Stretch in Swine

2018· article· en· W3173806783 on OpenAlexaff
Brian R. Weil, Cody Smith, Filip Konečný, George Techiryan, Henry Zimmer, John M. Canty

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesAmerican Heart AssociationU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsPreloadMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineDiastoleHemodynamicsBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective Building on our observation that myocardial stretch induced by an acute elevation in left ventricular (LV) preload produces reversible systolic dysfunction and cardiomyocyte apoptosis, we recently demonstrated that swine subjected to intermittent myocardial stretch (IMS) for 2 weeks exhibit an adaptive increase in LV diastolic stiffness that protects the heart from stretch‐induced injury during subsequent periods of hemodynamic overload. The present study was designed to determine whether this pattern of myocardial remodeling and protection against stretch‐induced stunning is reversed by cessation of IMS. Methods Swine (n=6) were instrumented with an indwelling jugular vein catheter through which phenylephrine (PE; 300 μg/min; 2 hours/day) was administered via programmable infusion pump to intermittently raise LV end‐diastolic pressure (EDP) for 2 weeks (IMS). Hemodynamic and echocardiographic responses were evaluated under propofol anesthesia at the initial study and after 2‐weeks of IMS. Daily PE infusions were subsequently stopped to provide a 2‐week period in which animals were no longer subjected to IMS. A final physiologic study was then performed (“4‐week study”) to assess the persistence of IMS‐induced alterations in LV function. At each study, serial blood sampling was performed to assess serum cTnI levels via porcine‐specific ELISA. Postmortem analysis of interstitial collagen deposition was completed on picrosirius red‐stained LV tissue sections and compared to animals subjected to 2 weeks of IMS (n=8) and age‐matched controls (n=5). Results At the initial study, PE‐induced preload elevation elicited a significant increase in LV end‐diastolic volume (ΔEDV: 14±3 mL/m 2 , p<0.05) that caused stretch‐induced stunning and a marked elevation in serum cTnI (Figure). After 2 weeks of IMS, chamber dilatation during PE was attenuated (ΔEDV: 4±1 mL/m 2 , p=ns) by a significant increase in LV diastolic stiffness (ΔEDP/ΔEDV during PE from 0.8±0.2 to 2.3±0.5 mmHg/mL, p<0.05) that prevented stretch‐induced systolic dysfunction and cTnI release (Figure). Adaptive LV stiffening (ΔEDP/ΔEDV: 3.3±1.4 mmHg/mL) and protection against stretch‐induced injury (ΔEDV: 3±1 mL/m 2 ) were still observed at the 4‐week study despite cessation of IMS during the previous 2 weeks. Persistent LV diastolic stiffening was also demonstrated by admittance catheter‐derived assessment of the EDPVR, which revealed an increase in the LV stiffness constant (β) at the 2‐week (0.055±0.013) and 4‐week (0.043±0.009) studies compared with normal controls (0.025±0.003; both p<0.05). Consistent with the notion that IMS‐induced remodeling is not reversed by cessation of episodic preload elevation, interstitial collagen deposition after the 4‐week study (16.3±1.1%) was comparable to that observed in animals subjected to 2 weeks of IMS (11.2±1.3 %) and significantly higher than normal controls (6.6±0.7 %). Conclusion These results demonstrate that IMS‐induced LV diastolic stiffening is not reversed by simply discontinuing transient episodes of hemodynamic overload. This likely relates to an inability to replenish myocytes lost to stretch‐induced apoptosis and remove interstitial collagen without additional regenerative and/or anti‐fibrotic therapy. These findings may have implications for the treatment of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction whom exhibit LV stiffening without persistent hypertension or anatomic LV hypertrophy. Support or Funding Information Supported by the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (HL‐055324 and HL‐061610), the American Heart Association (17SDG33660200), the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR001412), the Department of Veterans Affairs (1IO1BX002659), and the Albert and Elizabeth Rekate Fund in Cardiovascular Medicine. This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207