MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Determining how 4‐phenylbutyrate inhibits tunicamycininduced acute kidney injury

2012· article· en· W3173824481 on OpenAlexafffund
Rachel E. Carlisle, Elise Brimble, Alistair J. Ingram, Richard C. Austin, Jeffrey G. Dickhout

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsTunicamycinPhenylbutyrateAcute kidney injuryUnfolded protein responseNephrotoxicityPharmacologyChemistryHistone deacetylase inhibitorEndoplasmic reticulumKidneyVacuolizationMedicineInternal medicineHistone deacetylaseEndocrinologyBiochemistryHistone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been demonstrated that many nephrotoxic drugs, such as tunicamycin, induce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress as part of the mechanism by which they cause acute kidney injury (AKI). There are three main mechanisms by which the low molecular weight chemical chaperone 4‐phenylbutyrate (4‐PBA) can modify AKI: (1) as a histone deacetylase inhibitor, (2) as an ER stress inhibitor, and (3) as a mediator of waste nitrogen excretion. We hypothesized that 4‐PBA would inhibit tunicamycin‐induced acute kidney injury using one of these three mechanisms. C57BL/6J mice were either untreated or pre‐treated with 4‐PBA for one week, at a dose of 1 g/kg, delivered in the drinking water. Proximal tubular cell injury was then induced by intraperitoneal injection of tunicamycin (0.5 mg/kg) for 3 days. In the whole animal, tunicamycin was found to induce proximal tubule injury in the juxtamedullary region, demonstrated by the presence of tubular epithelial cell vacuolization, in PAS‐stained sections. 4‐PBA pretreatment reduced the injury score associated with tunicamycin‐induced AKI. The mechanism by which 4‐PBA prevents tunicamycin‐induced kidney injury is currently under investigation. Supported by CIHR OSO‐115895.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy→French-language works237,207→