MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Structural Basis of Protein Lysine Methylation

2009· article· en· W3173845771 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Raymond C. Trievel

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMethylationMethyltransferaseLysineHistone methylationHistone methyltransferaseHistoneBiochemistryBiologyDNA methylationGeneticsDNAGeneAmino acidGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lysine methylation is a prominent covalent modification of histones, transcription factors, and other nuclear proteins. Site‐specific lysine methylation has been implicated in regulating a myriad of genomic processes, including transcription, DNA damage response, X‐chromosome inactivation, and genome stability. In addition to the site of methylation, the lysine epsilon‐amine group can undergo mono‐, di‐, or trimethylation, imparting a hierarchical level of specificity in methyllysine signaling. Both the site and degree of methylation are dynamically regulated through the concerted activities of lysine methyltransferases and demethylases, permitting the fine‐tuning of lysine methylation status in vivo. Structural and biochemical studies of the SET domain family of lysine methyltransferases and the JmjC class of lysine demethylases have furnished insights into the substrate specificities of these enzymes and have yielded a framework for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the dynamics of lysine methylation. This research is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (GM073839), the University of Michigan's Office of the Vice President for Research, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→French-language works237,207→