MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3173848166 · doi:10.24952/ibtidaiyah.v1i1.3716

INTEGRASI STRUKTUR DAN FUNGSI BAGIAN TUMBUHAN DENGAN BAYANI, BURHANI, ‘IRFANI DI SDIT BUNAYYA

2021· article· en· W3173848166 on OpenAlexaff
Syarifuddin Harahap, Asriana Harahap

Bibliographic record

VenueDIRASATUL IBTIDAIYAH · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Character Development
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRevelationFunction (biology)Expression (computer science)Mathematics educationSociologyPedagogyComputer sciencePsychologyLiteratureArtBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractPlants are living things that do not experience the activity of moving like humans and animals, but they can reproduce in their own way. The parts that are in plants are always different from one another, this is influenced by climatic factors and geographic areas. Areas that have lots of sunlight will be different from plants that live in areas with cool weather or below 20 degrees Celsius. Based on the issues that have developed in education during this decade, this paper will try to develop science material on "Structure and Function of Plant Parts" in SDIT Bunayya students. If the main source (origin) of science in the Bayani approach is text (revelation), then in the 'irfani approach the main source is experience (experience), which is an authentic life experience, and is actually an invaluable lesson. Inner experiences that are very deep, authentic, innate, and almost unspeakable by logic and cannot be expressed by language. This is what is called direct experience, and is called hudhri science in the isyraqiyyah tradition. All these authentic experiences can be felt directly without having to say it first through the expression of "language" or "logic". Keywords: integration; plants; bayani; burhani; and 'irfani.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDIRASATUL IBTIDAIYAHSame topicEducation and Character DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207