MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3173878127 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.160314

Climate Change Trends in Colombia: A Case Study in Facatativá, Cundinamarca

2021· article· en· W3173878127 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Daniel Armando Robledo-Buitrago, Manuel Francisco Polanco Puerta, Miguel A. De Luque-Villa, Mauricio Mesa-Caro, Carlos Alberto Calderón Ricardo

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicEnvironmental and Ecological Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecipitationClimate changeEnvironmental scienceClimatologyGeographyPhysical geographyGeologyMeteorologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change modifies the average climate behavior over a long period, generated by natural phenomena or anthropogenic causes. This change has an important impact on climate variables, such as temperature and precipitation, worldwide but also has various effects on the local scale. The purpose of this research was to determine climate behavior and the magnitude of climate change in the last 30 years in the municipality of Facatativá, Cundinamarca. Precipitation and temperature were analyzed using data from climatological stations around Facatativá, which belong to the Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales (IDEAM) and the Corporación Autónoma Regional de Cundinamarca. These data provided the average temperature in this municipality, between 9.2℃ and 14.0℃, with an increasing trend between 0.00℃/yr to the west and 0.03℃/yr to the east of the municipality. The Precipitation ranged between 781 mm/yr and 1200 mm/yr, with an increasing trend of between 3.0 mm/yr in the west and 12.0 mm/yr in the northwest.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicEnvironmental and Ecological StudiesFrench-language works237,207